PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CDEI having a 12.39% return and SPTM slightly lower at 12.18%.


CDEI

1D
1.06%
1M
1.19%
6M
11.52%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.30%

SPTM

1D
1.42%
1M
1.63%
6M
9.75%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.88%
ALL TIME*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$670.28K$332.00K$158.81K
$39.82M$39.76M$45.46M

CDEI vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
12.39%16.60%18.67%22.82%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
12.18%16.93%23.87%17.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and SPTM is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.96

The correlation between CDEI and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDEI vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDEI
SPTM

Technology

42.5%
36.3%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
9.3%

Communication Services

10.4%
8.7%

Industrials

7.4%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
9.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.3%

Utilities

1.6%
2.6%

Energy

0.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.2%
2.2%

Technology

CDEI
42.5%
SPTM
36.3%

Financial Services

CDEI
15.7%
SPTM
12.5%

Healthcare

CDEI
12.2%
SPTM
9.3%

Communication Services

CDEI
10.4%
SPTM
8.7%

Industrials

CDEI
7.4%
SPTM
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

CDEI
3.9%
SPTM
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CDEI
3.4%
SPTM
9.1%

Real Estate

CDEI
2.2%
SPTM
2.3%

Utilities

CDEI
1.6%
SPTM
2.6%

Energy

CDEI
0.4%
SPTM
3.5%

Basic Materials

CDEI
0.2%
SPTM
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDEI vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDEISPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.73

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

11.90

-0.87

CDEI vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEISPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-54.80%

+35.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-8.68%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-18.87%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-9.00%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.99%

+0.33%

Volatility

CDEI vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 3.77%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEISPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.77%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

10.10%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

12.79%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.98%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

18.04%

-2.97%

CDEI vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CDEI vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SPTM's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.97%1.05%1.22%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.05%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CDEI and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CDEI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to SPTM (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 20.28% vs 19.13% for CDEI. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 20.28% return vs 19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for CDEI.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.97% for CDEI.

CDEI tracks Russell 1000 Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.03% for SPTM.

CDEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer