CDC vs. VFLO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - CDC tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index while VFLO tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDC returned 14.05%/yr vs 24.50%/yr for VFLO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.

Performance

CDC vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 22.09% return.

CDC

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 13.97%
• YTD: 18.49%
• 1Y: 23.40%
• 3Y*: 14.05%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

VFLO

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 3.67%
• 6M: 19.78%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.81%
• 3Y*: 24.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	18.49%	8.96%	14.48%	1.07%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	22.09%	17.51%	21.83%	15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and VFLO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.62

The correlation between CDC and VFLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDC vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDC	VFLO
Financial Services	24.3%	0.0%
Utilities	23.9%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	15.8%	0.0%
Energy	8.5%	8.6%
Healthcare	7.1%	17.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	15.9%
Technology	4.7%	44.4%
Industrials	4.5%	3.6%
Communication Services	3.8%	4.2%
Basic Materials	0.6%	4.1%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

CDC vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 87
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 91
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDC	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.44	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.44	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.43	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	5.90	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.58	18.38	-3.80

CDC vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and VFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDC vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDC	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.37%	-17.79%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-6.44%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-17.79%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-2.46%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.06%	-0.45%

Volatility

CDC vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDC	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.20%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	12.11%	-4.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.20%	15.56%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.56%	15.99%	-3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.20%	15.99%	-2.79%

CDC vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDC vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than VFLO's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.03%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.12%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDC and VFLO in my portfolio?

CDC and VFLO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDC or VFLO?

VFLO has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to CDC (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs VFLO's -17.79%.

Which ETF is better, CDC or VFLO?

On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 24.50% vs 14.05% for CDC. On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDC or VFLO?

Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 24.50% return vs 14.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDC or VFLO?

CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDC or VFLO?

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 1.12% for VFLO.

What is the main difference between CDC and VFLO?

CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.39% for VFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.