CDC vs. SELV
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both Low Volatility funds. CDC is passively managed, while SELV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDC returned 14.24%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for SELV. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SELV.
Performance
CDC vs. SELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 8.08% return.
CDC
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
SELV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04M | $983.49K | $1.23M | |
| $562.11K | $491.64K | $527.59K |
CDC vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 18.09% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -11.03% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 8.08% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and SELV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CDC and SELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
CDC vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
SELV
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
CDC
SELV
Financial Services
CDC
SELV
Consumer Defensive
CDC
SELV
Energy
CDC
SELV
Healthcare
CDC
SELV
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
SELV
Technology
CDC
SELV
Communication Services
CDC
SELV
Industrials
CDC
SELV
Basic Materials
CDC
SELV
Real Estate
CDC
SELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
SELV
CDC vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.27 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 2.51 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 6.73 | +6.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDC vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and SELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -13.73% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -5.92% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -8.94% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.16% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -2.34% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 2.21% | -0.60% |
Volatility
CDC vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 3.78%, while SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 4.29% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 7.94% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 9.84% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 11.97% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 11.97% | +1.25% |
CDC vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than SELV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.05% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and SELV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SELV has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to CDC (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs SELV's -13.73%.
On 3-year performance, CDC leads with 14.24% vs 13.17% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDC has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.65% for SELV.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.15% for SELV.
CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDC and SELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer