CDC vs. CSB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while CSB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDC returned 10.03%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for CSB. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.

Performance

CDC vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDC having a 10.03% annualized return and CSB not far behind at 9.58%.

CDC

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

CSB

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 17.95%
• 3Y*: 11.48%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	10.57%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	15.77%
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	8.30%	2.26%	9.64%	12.60%	-13.11%	27.04%	11.30%	21.12%	-7.10%	11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and CSB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015	0.77

The correlation between CDC and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDC vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDC	CSB
Utilities	24.3%	22.0%
Financial Services	23.4%	26.5%
Consumer Defensive	15.9%	4.4%
Energy	9.5%	11.5%
Technology	6.9%	1.2%
Healthcare	6.8%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	19.0%
Communication Services	4.4%	3.6%
Industrials	2.3%	8.5%
Basic Materials	0.0%	3.4%
Real Estate	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

CDC vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CSB

CSB Risk / Return Rank: 40
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDC	CSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.25	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.92	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.22	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	2.51	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.37	7.26	+4.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDC vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDC	CSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.25	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.20	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.45	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.45	+0.30

Drawdowns

CDC vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and CSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDC	CSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.37%	-42.07%	+20.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-7.18%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-21.82%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	-24.49%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.37%	-42.07%	+20.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-3.12%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-7.14%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	2.48%	-0.88%

Volatility

CDC vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 2.66%, while VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDC	CSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	3.59%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.84%	9.19%	-2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	14.54%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.54%	18.78%	-6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	21.31%	-8.10%

CDC vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDC vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.18%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.26%	3.54%	3.12%	3.45%	3.60%	3.11%	3.70%	3.19%	3.45%	3.19%	2.85%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDC and CSB in my portfolio?

CDC and CSB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDC or CSB?

CSB has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to CDC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs CSB's -42.07%.

Which ETF is better, CDC or CSB?

On 10-year performance, CDC leads with 10.03% vs 9.58% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDC or CSB?

Over the 10-year period, CDC has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDC or CSB?

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDC or CSB?

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.18% for CDC.

What is the main difference between CDC and CSB?

CDC is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CSB is Small Cap Blend Equities. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.35% for CSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.