CDC vs. AVLV
CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - CDC tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index while AVLV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDC returned 11.97%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
CDC vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.
CDC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 18.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.57% | 8.96% | 14.48% | -4.99% | -7.86% | 8.32% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and AVLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CDC and AVLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CDC vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDC
AVLV
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
CDC
AVLV
Financial Services
CDC
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
CDC
AVLV
Energy
CDC
AVLV
Technology
CDC
AVLV
Healthcare
CDC
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
CDC
AVLV
Communication Services
CDC
AVLV
Industrials
CDC
AVLV
Basic Materials
CDC
AVLV
Real Estate
CDC
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDC vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
CDC
AVLV
CDC vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDC | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.57 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 6.09 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 24.39 | -13.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDC | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 3.18 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.86 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CDC vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDC | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.37% | -19.50% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -6.39% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -19.50% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | 0.00% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -3.93% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.59% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CDC vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 2.66%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDC | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.12% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.84% | 9.04% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.77% | 12.29% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 17.35% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 17.35% | -4.14% |
CDC vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDC vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.18% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDC and AVLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to CDC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 11.97% for CDC. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.
CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.15% for AVLV.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDC and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer