PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCS vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCS vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCS achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CCS has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 12.79%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


CCS

1D
3.92%
1M
6.18%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-9.13%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
-4.36%
5Y*
-4.76%
10Y*
12.79%

FDIS

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCS vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
-4.29%-17.62%-18.57%84.79%-37.92%87.95%60.07%58.46%-44.50%48.10%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.32%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CCS and FDIS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2014

0.53

The correlation between CCS and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCS vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCS
CCS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCS vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCSFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.68

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

2.13

-1.65

CCS vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCS and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCSFDISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.57

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.26

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.62

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.61

-0.41

Drawdowns

CCS vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCS drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCS and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.33%

-39.16%

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.02%

-15.50%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.47%

-27.43%

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.47%

-39.16%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.33%

-39.16%

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.66%

-4.90%

-40.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-7.49%

-13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

4.94%

+9.72%

Volatility

CCS vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

Century Communities, Inc. (CCS) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 5.19%. This indicates that CCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

5.19%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.60%

13.06%

+16.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.36%

18.37%

+23.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.13%

23.87%

+18.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.20%

22.29%

+24.91%

Dividends

CCS vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

CCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
2.17%1.95%1.42%1.01%1.60%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCS and FDIS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCS has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to FDIS (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCS dropped -73.33% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCS and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer