CCRV vs. CMT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while CMT (Core Molding Technologies, Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCRV vs. CMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMT

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 18.80%
• 6M: 18.10%
• 1Y: 44.19%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: 6.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. CMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	-0.05%	5.74%	5.47%	19.91%	33.78%	7.16%
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	18.80%	21.22%	-10.74%	42.65%	52.64%	-39.56%	85.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and CMT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020	0.04

Return for Risk

CCRV vs. CMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CMT

CMT Risk / Return Rank: 73
CMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. CMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCRV	CMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.67	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.20	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRV	CMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-96.21%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-55.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-19.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.30%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRV	CMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	33.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	41.62%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	44.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	61.31%	—

Dividends

CCRV vs. CMT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCRV nor CMT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMT Core Molding Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCRV and CMT in my portfolio?

CCRV and CMT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.