CCOR vs. USD
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative, while USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). CCOR is actively managed, while USD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -1.48%/yr vs 54.39%/yr for USD. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for USD.
Performance
CCOR vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 55.27% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.77%
USD
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- 6M
- 41.04%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 1Y
- 98.72%
- 3Y*
- 95.45%
- 5Y*
- 54.39%
- 10Y*
- 53.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 28.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.78K | $57.90K | $78.59K | |
| $71.31M | $70.59M | $96.20M |
CCOR vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.03% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.97% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 55.27% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 41.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and USD is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CCOR and USD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.47, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
CCOR vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCOR
USD
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CCOR
USD
Technology
CCOR
USD
Healthcare
CCOR
USD
-
Industrials
CCOR
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
CCOR
USD
-
Communication Services
CCOR
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
CCOR
USD
-
Energy
CCOR
USD
Utilities
CCOR
USD
-
Basic Materials
CCOR
USD
-
Real Estate
CCOR
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
USD
CCOR vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOR | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.52 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 7.21 | -7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -88.63% | +65.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -39.33% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -64.46% | +52.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -77.85% | +54.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.09% | -28.27% | +12.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -32.23% | +24.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 13.74% | -9.55% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 3.00%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 27.45% | -24.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | 61.08% | -54.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 73.76% | -65.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 78.77% | -67.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 70.41% | -59.63% |
CCOR vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than USD's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.37% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and USD have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to CCOR (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 5-year performance, USD leads with 54.39% vs -1.48% for CCOR. On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USD has performed better with a 54.39% return vs -1.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.37% for USD.
CCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USD is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.95% for USD.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer