CCOR vs. SGRT
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
CCOR vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 27.55% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- -1.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.77%
SGRT
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- YTD
- 27.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.78K | $57.90K | $78.59K | |
| $1.04M | $1.25M | $2.19M |
CCOR vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.03% | -1.53% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 27.55% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and SGRT is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CCOR vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCOR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -24.98% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.09% | -16.99% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -4.30% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | — | — |
Volatility
CCOR vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.24% | 38.89% | -30.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 38.89% | -27.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 38.89% | -28.11% |
CCOR vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SGRT's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and SGRT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.13% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer