CCOR vs. DGRO
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CCOR is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -2.56%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
CCOR vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
CCOR vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.68% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 14.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and DGRO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CCOR and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CCOR vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCOR
DGRO
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CCOR
DGRO
Technology
CCOR
DGRO
Healthcare
CCOR
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
CCOR
DGRO
Industrials
CCOR
DGRO
Communication Services
CCOR
DGRO
Energy
CCOR
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
CCOR
DGRO
Utilities
CCOR
DGRO
Basic Materials
CCOR
DGRO
Real Estate
CCOR
DGRO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
DGRO
CCOR vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCOR | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.43 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 3.50 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 13.52 | -15.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOR | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 2.39 | -3.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.77 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.76 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -35.10% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -6.47% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | -14.03% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -19.31% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.03% | -0.28% | -19.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -3.44% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 1.67% | +2.10% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 1.78%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.21% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | 6.91% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 9.48% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 13.82% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 16.62% | -5.87% |
CCOR vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and DGRO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.11% for CCOR.
They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer