PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOR vs. AVGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOR vs. AVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than AVGX's 69.89% return.


CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*

AVGX

1D
-0.83%
1M
29.49%
YTD
69.89%
6M
35.83%
1Y
156.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOR vs. AVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-3.71%3.52%-5.61%
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
69.89%46.98%69.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and AVGX is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOR vs. AVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOR vs. AVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCORAVGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.31

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.91

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

6.49

-8.07

CCOR vs. AVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the AVGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOR and AVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCORAVGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.83

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.21

-1.10

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. AVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum AVGX drawdown of -70.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and AVGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCORAVGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-70.97%

+47.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-54.09%

+45.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.03%

-0.83%

-19.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-22.71%

+15.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

24.20%

-20.43%

Volatility

CCOR vs. AVGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 1.78%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a volatility of 23.50%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCORAVGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

23.50%

-21.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

61.90%

-56.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

85.97%

-79.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

104.65%

-93.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

104.65%

-93.90%

CCOR vs. AVGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCOR vs. AVGX - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than AVGX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
0.97%1.65%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOR and AVGX have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGX has higher volatility (23.50%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs AVGX's -70.97%.

On 1-year performance, AVGX leads with 156.34% vs -5.97% for CCOR. On fees, CCOR is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGX has performed better with a 156.34% return vs -5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CCOR is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AVGX.

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.97% for AVGX.

CCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVGX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 1.29% for AVGX.

AVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOR and AVGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer