PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCO vs. AEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCO vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCO achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's -1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of -6.90%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.


CCO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
9.05%
6M
11.57%
1Y
115.18%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-6.90%

AEM

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-6.98%
1Y
39.16%
3Y*
53.19%
5Y*
24.66%
10Y*
14.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCO vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCO
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
9.05%61.31%-24.73%73.33%-68.28%100.61%-42.31%-44.89%14.80%10.53%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-1.16%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CCO and AEM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2005

0.09

Fundamentals

EPS

CCO:

-$0.55

AEM:

$10.60

PS Ratio

CCO:

0.55

AEM:

6.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCO:

$1.64B

AEM:

$13.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCO:

$645.84M

AEM:

$8.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCO:

$258.11M

AEM:

$9.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCO vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCO
CCO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCO vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCOAEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.30

1.00

+5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.25

2.69

+18.57

CCO vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCO and AEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCO vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCO drawdown since its inception was -94.19%, roughly equal to the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO and AEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.19%

-90.49%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-39.39%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.07%

-39.39%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.80%

-41.97%

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.12%

-53.86%

-39.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.44%

-33.68%

-33.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.99%

-46.64%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

14.62%

-9.18%

Volatility

CCO vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) is 1.41%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that CCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

15.34%

-13.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.38%

36.50%

-15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.89%

44.59%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.81%

37.08%

+28.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.67%

37.41%

+32.26%

Dividends

CCO vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

CCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.02%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
CCO
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.59%19.94%41.51%0.00%

Financials

CCO vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
373.86M
4.10B
(CCO) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCO vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
66.4%
Portfolio components
CCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 373.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

CCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.48M and revenue of 373.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

AEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

CCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -48.59M and revenue of 373.86M, resulting in a net margin of -13.0%.

AEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCO and AEM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEM has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to CCO (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCO dropped -94.19% vs AEM's -90.49%.

CCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCO and AEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer