CCO vs. PHYS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCO or PHYS.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between CCO and PHYS.TO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CCO:
-0.64
PHYS.TO:
2.76
CCO:
-0.82
PHYS.TO:
3.45
CCO:
0.91
PHYS.TO:
1.47
CCO:
-0.38
PHYS.TO:
5.11
CCO:
-1.53
PHYS.TO:
15.70
CCO:
21.90%
PHYS.TO:
2.70%
CCO:
52.58%
PHYS.TO:
15.40%
CCO:
-94.60%
PHYS.TO:
-27.08%
CCO:
-88.00%
PHYS.TO:
0.00%
Fundamentals
CCO:
$475.52M
PHYS.TO:
CA$30.82B
CCO:
-$0.26
PHYS.TO:
CA$0.13
CCO:
0.32
PHYS.TO:
6.11
CCO:
0.00
PHYS.TO:
1.33
CCO:
$1.02B
PHYS.TO:
CA$1.22B
CCO:
$550.20M
PHYS.TO:
CA$1.27B
CCO:
$436.61M
PHYS.TO:
CA$289.88M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCO achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS.TO's 24.95% return.
CCO
-30.57%
-19.39%
-38.63%
-36.16%
0.82%
-16.83%
PHYS.TO
24.95%
7.93%
23.79%
42.17%
13.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCO vs. PHYS.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CCO
PHYS.TO
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCO nor PHYS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 19.94% | 41.51% | 0.00% | 4.59% |
PHYS.TO Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCO drawdown since its inception was -94.60%, which is greater than PHYS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO and PHYS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) has a higher volatility of 27.41% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) at 7.34%. This indicates that CCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCO vs. PHYS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities