PortfoliosLab logo
CCO vs. MUX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCO and MUX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CCO vs. MUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCO:

-0.47

MUX:

-0.70

Sortino Ratio

CCO:

-0.48

MUX:

-0.53

Omega Ratio

CCO:

0.95

MUX:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

CCO:

-0.29

MUX:

-0.30

Martin Ratio

CCO:

-1.03

MUX:

-0.99

Ulcer Index

CCO:

24.71%

MUX:

29.38%

Daily Std Dev

CCO:

52.49%

MUX:

53.15%

Max Drawdown

CCO:

-94.60%

MUX:

-99.67%

Current Drawdown

CCO:

-85.24%

MUX:

-97.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCO:

$576.19M

MUX:

$393.03M

EPS

CCO:

-$0.23

MUX:

-$0.57

PEG Ratio

CCO:

16.86

MUX:

0.00

PS Ratio

CCO:

0.38

MUX:

2.33

PB Ratio

CCO:

0.00

MUX:

0.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCO:

$1.36B

MUX:

$168.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCO:

$715.85M

MUX:

$29.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

CCO:

$492.45M

MUX:

$17.48M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCO achieves a -14.60% return, which is significantly lower than MUX's -3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO has underperformed MUX with an annualized return of -15.01%, while MUX has yielded a comparatively higher -2.78% annualized return.


CCO

YTD

-14.60%

1M

21.87%

6M

-25.00%

1Y

-24.52%

3Y*

-11.71%

5Y*

4.76%

10Y*

-15.01%

MUX

YTD

-3.34%

1M

-6.93%

6M

-13.16%

1Y

-36.97%

3Y*

14.35%

5Y*

-0.88%

10Y*

-2.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


McEwen Mining Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCO vs. MUX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCO is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCO is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCO is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCO is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCO is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCO is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MUX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUX is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUX is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUX is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCO vs. MUX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the MUX Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCO and MUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CCO vs. MUX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCO nor MUX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCO
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.59%19.94%41.51%0.00%4.59%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.55%0.44%0.34%0.47%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCO vs. MUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCO drawdown since its inception was -94.60%, smaller than the maximum MUX drawdown of -99.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO and MUX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CCO vs. MUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) is 11.67%, while McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that CCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCO vs. MUX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and McEwen Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
334.18M
35.70M
(CCO) Total Revenue
(MUX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCO vs. MUX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and McEwen Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
49.6%
28.2%
(CCO) Gross Margin
(MUX) Gross Margin
CCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 165.65M and revenue of 334.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

MUX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.07M and revenue of 35.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

CCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.79M and revenue of 334.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.7%.

MUX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 6.70M and revenue of 35.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

CCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 62.51M and revenue of 334.18M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

MUX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a net income of -7.35M and revenue of 35.70M, resulting in a net margin of -20.6%.