CCO vs. MUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX).
Performance
CCO vs. MUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCO vs. MUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. | 7.24% | 61.31% | -24.73% | 73.33% | -68.28% | 100.61% | -42.31% | -44.89% | 14.80% | 10.53% |
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 10.32% | 137.92% | 7.91% | 23.04% | -33.90% | -10.00% | -22.44% | -30.01% | -19.78% | -21.37% |
Fundamentals
CCO:
-$0.28
MUX:
$0.19
CCO:
0.49
MUX:
8.34
CCO:
$1.60B
MUX:
$132.93M
CCO:
$0.00
MUX:
$22.45M
CCO:
-$319.50M
MUX:
$21.78M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCO achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than MUX's 10.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO has underperformed MUX with an annualized return of -4.51%, while MUX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.64% annualized return.
CCO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 50.00%
- 1Y
- 113.51%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- -4.51%
MUX
- 1D
- 8.27%
- 1M
- -27.97%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 170.46%
- 3Y*
- 34.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 0.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCO vs. MUX — Risk / Return Rank
CCO
MUX
CCO vs. MUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCO | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.63 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 2.90 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 4.55 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 12.57 | +4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCO | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.63 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.21 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.01 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.01 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCO and MUX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CCO vs. MUX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCO nor MUX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 19.94% | 41.51% | 0.00% |
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
CCO vs. MUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCO drawdown since its inception was -94.22%, smaller than the maximum MUX drawdown of -99.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO and MUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCO | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.22% | -99.67% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.42% | -36.28% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.80% | -82.48% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.16% | -93.89% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.98% | -93.21% | +25.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -86.46% | +32.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 13.14% | -6.27% |
Volatility
CCO vs. MUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) is 2.65%, while McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) has a volatility of 21.23%. This indicates that CCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCO | MUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 21.23% | -18.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.96% | 50.53% | -14.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.81% | 65.32% | -7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.77% | 63.07% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.85% | 64.01% | +5.84% |
Financials
CCO vs. MUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and McEwen Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities