CCNR vs. TER
CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) is Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while TER (Teradyne, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, CCNR returned 55.12% vs 386.56% for TER. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCNR vs. TER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly lower than TER's 108.47% return.
CCNR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 55.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TER
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- 19.38%
- YTD
- 108.47%
- 6M
- 108.68%
- 1Y
- 386.56%
- 3Y*
- 54.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.29%
- 10Y*
- 36.09%
CCNR vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 21.92% | 46.48% | -7.79% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 108.47% | 54.39% | -20.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCNR and TER is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CCNR and TER has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCNR vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank
CCNR
TER
CCNR vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCNR | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.64 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | 13.97 | -6.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.70 | 49.81 | -24.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCNR vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and TER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCNR | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -97.30% | +77.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -26.73% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -3.52% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -58.67% | +55.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 7.49% | -5.28% |
Volatility
CCNR vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is 6.78%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 25.00%. This indicates that CCNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCNR | TER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 25.00% | -18.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 53.10% | -39.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 67.20% | -48.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 50.20% | -30.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 45.31% | -25.17% |
Dividends
CCNR vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than TER's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.86% | 3.48% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCNR and TER have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to CCNR (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCNR dropped -20.06% vs TER's -97.30%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCNR and TER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer