CCNR vs. OEFA
CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while OEFA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index. CCNR is actively managed, while OEFA is passively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OEFA.
Performance
CCNR vs. OEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than OEFA's 7.89% return.
CCNR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 50.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.53%
OEFA
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $259.64K | $2.35M | $1.27M | |
| $54.40K | $51.66K | $155.29K |
CCNR vs. OEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 16.17% | 10.75% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 7.89% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCNR and OEFA is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.46 |
CCNR vs. OEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCNR
OEFA
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
CCNR
OEFA
-
Basic Materials
CCNR
OEFA
-
Consumer Defensive
CCNR
OEFA
Utilities
CCNR
OEFA
Industrials
CCNR
OEFA
Technology
CCNR
OEFA
Real Estate
CCNR
OEFA
-
Consumer Cyclical
CCNR
OEFA
Financial Services
CCNR
OEFA
Communication Services
CCNR
-
OEFA
Healthcare
CCNR
-
OEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCNR vs. OEFA — Risk / Return Rank
CCNR
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CCNR vs. OEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCNR | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCNR vs. OEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, which is greater than OEFA's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and OEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCNR | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -13.54% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.68% | -0.71% | -8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -3.44% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility
CCNR vs. OEFA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCNR | OEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 17.23% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 17.23% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 17.23% | +2.75% |
CCNR vs. OEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OEFA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCNR vs. OEFA - Dividend Comparison
CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than OEFA's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 3.00% | 3.48% | 1.27% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.38% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCNR and OEFA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OEFA.
CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.38% for OEFA.
CCNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while OEFA is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 0.48% for OEFA.
Find the right allocation for CCNR and OEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer