CCNR vs. URNM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. CCNR is actively managed, while URNM is passively managed. Over the past year, CCNR returned 50.02% vs 12.09% for URNM. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.

Performance

CCNR vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCNR achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's -11.51% return.

CCNR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 2.52%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 16.17%
• 1Y: 50.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.53%

URNM

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -8.06%
• 6M: -34.68%
• YTD: -11.51%
• 1Y: 12.09%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	$259.64K	$2.35M	$1.27M
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	$16.15M	$21.14M	$35.55M

CCNR vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	16.17%	46.48%	-7.79%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	-11.51%	40.78%	-20.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CCNR and URNM is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.48

CCNR vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCNR	URNM
Energy	37.5%	97.6%
Basic Materials	35.7%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	-
Utilities	8.8%	-
Industrials	7.6%	-
Technology	1.1%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

CCNR vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 90
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 84

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 17
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCNR vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCNR	URNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	0.21	+2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	0.69	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.08	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	0.26	+3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	0.54	+10.91

CCNR vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCNR and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCNR vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and URNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCNR	URNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-50.78%	+30.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	-43.89%	+31.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.68%	-42.17%	+32.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-18.48%	+14.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	20.85%	-16.59%

Volatility

CCNR vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is 4.71%, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that CCNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCNR	URNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	13.67%	-8.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	39.86%	-25.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.64%	53.26%	-34.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.98%	48.65%	-28.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	46.95%	-26.97%

CCNR vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCNR vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than URNM's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	3.00%	3.48%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	3.59%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCNR and URNM in my portfolio?

CCNR and URNM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCNR or URNM?

URNM has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to CCNR (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCNR dropped -20.06% vs URNM's -50.78%.

Which ETF is better, CCNR or URNM?

On 1-year performance, CCNR leads with 50.02% vs 12.09% for URNM. On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CCNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCNR or URNM?

Over the 1-year period, CCNR has performed better with a 50.02% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCNR or URNM?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCNR or URNM?

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.00% for CCNR.

What is the main difference between CCNR and URNM?

CCNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while URNM is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 0.85% for URNM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.