CCNR vs. SMRF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) and SMRF (ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS, while SMRF is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCNR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMRF.

Performance

CCNR vs. SMRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCNR

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.27%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 50.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.52%

SMRF

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	$256.37K	$2.34M	$1.27M
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	$242.56K	$268.44K	$363.09K

CCNR vs. SMRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	-3.10%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CCNR and SMRF is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.56

CCNR vs. SMRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCNR	SMRF
Energy	37.5%	37.8%
Basic Materials	35.7%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	-
Utilities	8.8%	17.3%
Industrials	7.6%	20.6%
Technology	1.1%	23.4%
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	2.0%
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

CCNR vs. SMRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCNR

CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 90
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SMRF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCNR vs. SMRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCNR	SMRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	—	—

Drawdowns

CCNR vs. SMRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCNR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum SMRF drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCNR and SMRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCNR	SMRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.06%	-26.22%	+6.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.53%	-17.77%	+8.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-8.67%	+4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCNR	SMRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	46.48%	-27.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	46.48%	-26.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	46.48%	-26.52%

CCNR vs. SMRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCNR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCNR vs. SMRF - Dividend Comparison

CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than SMRF's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	2.99%	3.48%	1.27%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCNR and SMRF in my portfolio?

CCNR and SMRF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCNR or SMRF?

On fees, CCNR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCNR or SMRF?

CCNR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCNR or SMRF?

CCNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.58% for SMRF.

What is the main difference between CCNR and SMRF?

CCNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while SMRF is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCNR and 0.65% for SMRF.