CCJ vs. URNM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CCJ (Cameco Corporation) is a stock, while URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Over the past 5 years, CCJ returned 40.06%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for URNM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

CCJ vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 24.63% return, which is significantly higher than URNM's 11.22% return.

CCJ

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 24.63%
• 6M: 21.18%
• 1Y: 90.56%
• 3Y*: 54.85%
• 5Y*: 40.06%
• 10Y*: 26.48%

URNM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 4.99%
• 1Y: 49.43%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCJ vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CCJ Cameco Corporation	24.63%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	51.47%	-4.81%
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF	11.22%	40.78%	-14.13%	57.80%	-11.86%	78.32%	68.36%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CCJ and URNM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019	0.84

The correlation between CCJ and URNM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CCJ vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 83
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 29
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCJ vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCJ	URNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.97	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.60	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	1.55	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	3.35	+4.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCJ vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCJ and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCJ	URNM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	0.97	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.32	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.67	-0.43

Drawdowns

CCJ vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and URNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCJ	URNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.53%	-50.78%	-36.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.69%	-32.04%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.01%	-50.78%	+10.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.01%	-50.78%	+10.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.97%	-27.31%	+12.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.10%	-18.03%	-28.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.37%	14.81%	-3.44%

Volatility

CCJ vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) have volatilities of 15.53% and 16.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCJ	URNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.53%	16.06%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.06%	40.27%	-2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.90%	51.44%	+3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.68%	48.29%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.59%	46.89%	-0.30%

Dividends

CCJ vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than URNM's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.15%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF	2.86%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCJ and URNM in my portfolio?

CCJ and URNM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCJ or URNM?

URNM has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to CCJ (15.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCJ dropped -87.53% vs URNM's -50.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.