CCFE vs. TMDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCFE (Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF) and TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. CCFE is actively managed, while TMDV is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCFE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TMDV.

Performance

CCFE vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFE achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly lower than TMDV's 4.53% return.

CCFE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMDV

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFE vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	4.22%	7.81%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	4.53%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CCFE and TMDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

CCFE vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 16
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFE vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCFE	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.30	+0.22

Drawdowns

CCFE vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFE drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFE and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCFE	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-33.42%	+12.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.92%	-6.56%	-6.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-5.43%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCFE	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.40%	12.10%	+12.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.40%	14.43%	+9.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	18.64%	+5.76%

CCFE vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCFE vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

CCFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TMDV's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.62%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCFE and TMDV in my portfolio?

CCFE and TMDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCFE or TMDV?

On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCFE or TMDV?

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCFE or TMDV?

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.

What is the main difference between CCFE and TMDV?

They also come from different issuers: Concourse Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CCFE and 0.35% for TMDV.