PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCEF vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCEF vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 15.96% return.


CCEF

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.04%
6M
6.94%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.62%
YTD
15.96%
6M
15.17%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEF vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
6.04%13.47%17.80%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
15.96%15.09%19.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and DIVB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.69

The correlation between CCEF and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCEF vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCEFDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.04

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

13.51

-4.71

CCEF vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCEFDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-36.93%

+23.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-6.82%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-2.10%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-4.97%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.04%

-0.25%

Volatility

CCEF vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 2.58%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCEFDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

4.61%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

8.81%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

11.69%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

15.26%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

18.36%

-7.58%

CCEF vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCEF vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than DIVB's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
7.96%8.08%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.29%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCEF and DIVB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to CCEF (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 1-year performance, DIVB leads with 27.44% vs 15.76% for CCEF. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 27.44% return vs 15.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.96%, compared with 2.29% for DIVB.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.05% for DIVB.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCEF and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer