CCEF vs. CAIQ
CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCEF is a Dividend fund actively managed by Calamos, while CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. CCEF is actively managed, while CAIQ is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCEF charges 2.74%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than CAIQ's 13.05% return.
CCEF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 6.10%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAIQ
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 6.10% | 4.31% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 13.05% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEF and CAIQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEF vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
CCEF
CAIQ
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCEF | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCEF | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 2.58 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEF | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -9.06% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.44% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -1.71% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | — | — |
Volatility
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCEF | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.95% | 13.98% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 13.98% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 13.98% | -3.21% |
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCEF vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than CAIQ's 8.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.49% | 1.54% | 0.00% |
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 7.96% | 8.08% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCEF and CAIQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAIQ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAIQ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 7.96% for CCEF.
CCEF is categorized as Dividend, while CAIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for CCEF and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer