CAIQ vs. QQQM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - CAIQ tracks the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 12.29% return.

CAIQ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: 8.13%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQM

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 10.92%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 22.37%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	$5.22M	$5.65M	$5.13M
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	$962.22M	$908.74M	$1.19B

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	8.99%	4.03%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	12.29%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIQ and QQQM is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

CAIQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAIQ	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.66	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.88	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.01	—

Drawdowns

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIQ	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-35.04%	+25.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.01%	-7.69%	+3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-8.15%	+6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAIQ	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	19.24%	-5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	22.74%	-9.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	22.32%	-8.80%

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAIQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than QQQM's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	10.41%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.46%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAIQ and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CAIQ and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CAIQ or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAIQ or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAIQ or QQQM?

CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.41%, compared with 0.46% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between CAIQ and QQQM?

CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.15% for QQQM.