CAIQ vs. QQQM
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - CAIQ tracks the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.46% return.
CAIQ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 20.46%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 41.06%
- 3Y*
- 27.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- —
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.63% | 4.03% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.46% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIQ and QQQM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQM
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -35.04% | +25.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.97% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -8.20% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIQ | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 17.55% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 22.48% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 22.26% | -8.51% |
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.53% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CAIQ and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.53%, compared with 0.53% for QQQM.
CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.15% for QQQM.
Find the right allocation for CAIQ and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer