CBUV.DE vs. ESPO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO).
CBUV.DE and ESPO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBUV.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Metaverse. It was launched on Dec 7, 2022. ESPO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2018. Both CBUV.DE and ESPO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -9.18% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -10.87% | 10.87% | 57.36% | 24.73% |
Different Trading Currencies
CBUV.DE is traded in EUR, while ESPO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESPO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -10.87% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- -10.87%
- 6M
- -23.33%
- 1Y
- -3.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
ESPO
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | -0.14 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | -0.05 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.08 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | -0.19 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | -0.14 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.67 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and ESPO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
CBUV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.43% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -40.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and ESPO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -50.99% | +23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -27.81% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.94% | -25.27% | +8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -14.81% | +9.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.65% | 11.59% | -3.94% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 6.21%, while VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 6.94% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 13.87% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 21.73% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 23.84% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 25.18% | -4.77% |