PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUV.DE vs. ESPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBUV.DE is traded in EUR, while ESPO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESPO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -13.28% return.


CBUV.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
4.35%
YTD
4.62%
6M
2.15%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10Y*

ESPO

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-13.28%
6M
-17.43%
1Y
-15.32%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUV.DE
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.62%8.91%30.32%51.01%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
-13.28%10.87%57.36%24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUV.DE and ESPO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023

0.52

The correlation between CBUV.DE and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUV.DE
CBUV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPO
ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUV.DEESPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.87

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

-0.58

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

-1.02

+3.12

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUV.DE and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUV.DEESPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

-0.85

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.64

+0.68

Drawdowns

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -40.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and ESPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUV.DEESPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.66%

-40.76%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.30%

-26.46%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.66%

-26.46%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-25.60%

+21.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-12.04%

+7.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.59%

15.12%

-6.53%

Volatility

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUV.DEESPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.74%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

13.64%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

18.06%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

23.76%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

25.02%

-4.76%

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUV.DE vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

CBUV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CBUV.DE
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESPO
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF
1.46%1.24%0.44%0.96%0.91%3.36%0.12%0.22%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUV.DE and ESPO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUV.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUV.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

CBUV.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.55% for ESPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and ESPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer