PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DR7E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUV.DE
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-9.18%8.91%30.32%51.01%
DR7E.DE
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
5.36%15.37%0.76%14.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than DR7E.DE's 5.36% return.


CBUV.DE

1D
2.76%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-9.18%
6M
-11.38%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10Y*

DR7E.DE

1D
3.78%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
5.36%
6M
11.19%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBUV.DE and DR7E.DE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Return for Risk

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUV.DE
CBUV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DR7E.DE
DR7E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DR7E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DR7E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DR7E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DR7E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DR7E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DR7E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUV.DEDR7E.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

1.47

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

2.07

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

3.56

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.14

10.61

-9.47

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the DR7E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUV.DE and DR7E.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUV.DEDR7E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

1.47

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.02

+1.09

Correlation

The correlation between CBUV.DE and DR7E.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUV.DE nor DR7E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum DR7E.DE drawdown of -40.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and DR7E.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUV.DEDR7E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.66%

-40.66%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.30%

-17.27%

-3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.94%

-5.95%

-10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-18.99%

+14.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

3.67%

+3.98%

Volatility

CBUV.DE vs. DR7E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 6.21%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DR7E.DE) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DR7E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBUV.DEDR7E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

7.27%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

16.50%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

25.85%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

24.78%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

24.78%

-4.37%