PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUV.DE
iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-9.18%8.91%30.32%51.01%
ESP0.DE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF
-11.31%13.28%57.80%22.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly higher than ESP0.DE's -11.31% return.


CBUV.DE

1D
2.76%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-9.18%
6M
-11.38%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10Y*

ESP0.DE

1D
2.28%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
-11.31%
6M
-23.26%
1Y
-0.40%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESP0.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUV.DE
CBUV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ESP0.DE
ESP0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUV.DEESP0.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

-0.02

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

0.11

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.01

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.05

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.14

-0.12

+1.26

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUV.DE and ESP0.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUV.DEESP0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.02

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.74

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CBUV.DE and ESP0.DE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUV.DE nor ESP0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum ESP0.DE drawdown of -40.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and ESP0.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUV.DEESP0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.66%

-40.11%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.30%

-26.09%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.94%

-23.26%

+6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-12.47%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

11.11%

-3.46%

Volatility

CBUV.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBUV.DEESP0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

6.35%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

12.50%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

20.20%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

22.61%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

23.29%

-2.88%