CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE
CBUV.DE (iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUV.DE tracks the STOXX Global Metaverse while CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUV.DE returned 21.34%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CAUT.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUV.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CAUT.DE.
Performance
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUV.DE achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's 0.51% return.
CBUV.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUV.DE iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.62% | 8.91% | 30.32% | 51.01% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -38.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUV.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUV.DE
CAUT.DE
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUV.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.08 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 4.42 | -2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUV.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | -0.27 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUV.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.66%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUV.DE and CAUT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUV.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.66% | -69.24% | +41.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.30% | -15.89% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.66% | -42.32% | +14.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -43.96% | +39.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -45.53% | +40.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 7.51% | +1.08% |
Volatility
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Metaverse UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUV.DE) is 4.51%, while Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that CBUV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUV.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 6.05% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 18.36% | -5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 28.22% | -9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 33.13% | -12.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 33.13% | -12.87% |
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUV.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUV.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUV.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUV.DE and CAUT.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUV.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUV.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CBUV.DE tracks STOXX Global Metaverse, while CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUV.DE and 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUV.DE and CAUT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer