CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE).

CAUT.DE and CSTA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAUT.DE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. It was launched on Jan 18, 2022. CSTA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. Both CAUT.DE and CSTA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-0.16%	27.42%	9.31%	-35.25%	-26.40%
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist	-2.16%	3.46%	6.60%	32.50%	-16.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly higher than CSTA.DE's -2.16% return.

CAUT.DE

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: -0.16%
• 6M: -6.22%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: -1.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSTA.DE

• 1D: 3.73%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -2.16%
• 6M: -3.74%
• 1Y: 2.42%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

CAUT.DE

Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating

CSTA.DE

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUT.DE

CAUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CAUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CAUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CAUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CAUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CSTA.DE

CSTA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CSTA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CSTA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CSTA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CSTA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAUT.DE	CSTA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.10	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.31	+1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.04	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	0.17	+1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	0.46	+3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the CSTA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUT.DE and CSTA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAUT.DE	CSTA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.10	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.46	-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between CAUT.DE and CSTA.DE is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAUT.DE nor CSTA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.59%	1.04%	0.52%	0.55%	1.26%	1.49%	0.09%

Drawdowns

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than CSTA.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and CSTA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAUT.DE	CSTA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.24%	-40.24%	-29.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.11%	-14.91%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.33%	-10.99%	-33.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.76%	-8.82%	-36.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	5.58%	+2.09%

Volatility

CAUT.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) is 7.58%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that CAUT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSTA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAUT.DE	CSTA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	8.25%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.70%	16.85%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.86%	23.77%	+6.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.34%	24.72%	+8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.34%	23.12%	+10.22%