PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAUT.DE
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-0.16%27.42%9.31%-35.25%-26.40%
AKWA.DE
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF
2.37%0.80%12.17%20.84%-4.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than AKWA.DE's 2.37% return.


CAUT.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
10Y*

AKWA.DE

1D
1.96%
1M
-5.80%
YTD
2.37%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AKWA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUT.DE
CAUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AKWA.DE
AKWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AKWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAUT.DEAKWA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.32

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.55

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.67

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.62

1.89

+1.73

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the AKWA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUT.DE and AKWA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAUT.DEAKWA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.32

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.24

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between CAUT.DE and AKWA.DE is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAUT.DE nor AKWA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than AKWA.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and AKWA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAUT.DEAKWA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.24%

-23.07%

-46.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-10.93%

-6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.33%

-5.96%

-38.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.76%

-7.64%

-38.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.67%

3.15%

+4.52%

Volatility

CAUT.DE vs. AKWA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE) at 5.32%. This indicates that CAUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AKWA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAUT.DEAKWA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

5.32%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.70%

9.70%

+12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.86%

16.60%

+13.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.34%

16.08%

+17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.34%

16.08%

+17.26%