CBT vs. TINY
CBT (Cabot Corporation) is a stock, while TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Over the past 3 years, CBT returned 15.26%/yr vs 32.64%/yr for TINY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CBT vs. TINY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBT achieves a 40.22% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 67.40% return.
CBT
- 1D
- 5.03%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 40.22%
- 6M
- 40.52%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
TINY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 11.06%
- YTD
- 67.40%
- 6M
- 65.15%
- 1Y
- 106.43%
- 3Y*
- 32.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBT vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 40.22% | -25.68% | 11.25% | 27.63% | 21.38% | 4.22% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 67.40% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBT and TINY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CBT and TINY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBT vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank
CBT
TINY
CBT vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabot Corporation (CBT) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.47 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 6.39 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 22.29 | -20.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBT vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBT drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBT and TINY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.87% | -43.79% | -39.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.82% | -16.75% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.78% | -42.13% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.34% | -5.83% | -12.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -15.98% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.02% | 4.79% | +7.23% |
Volatility
CBT vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cabot Corporation (CBT) is 10.62%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that CBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBT | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 13.19% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 28.54% | -4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 34.52% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.72% | 32.67% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 32.67% | +2.70% |
Dividends
CBT vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison
CBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than TINY's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBT Cabot Corporation | 1.98% | 2.69% | 1.85% | 1.88% | 2.21% | 2.53% | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.04% | 2.02% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.17% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBT and TINY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to CBT (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBT dropped -82.87% vs TINY's -43.79%.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBT and TINY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer