PortfoliosLab logo
FHN vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FHN and XLF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

FHN vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Horizon Corporation (FHN) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
30.91%
466.41%
FHN
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FHN:

0.64

XLF:

0.92

Sortino Ratio

FHN:

1.15

XLF:

1.37

Omega Ratio

FHN:

1.16

XLF:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

FHN:

0.60

XLF:

1.20

Martin Ratio

FHN:

2.60

XLF:

4.72

Ulcer Index

FHN:

9.24%

XLF:

3.94%

Daily Std Dev

FHN:

37.63%

XLF:

20.15%

Max Drawdown

FHN:

-87.57%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

FHN:

-23.51%

XLF:

-7.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHN achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FHN has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 5.65%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.


FHN

YTD

-10.84%

1M

-7.38%

6M

5.84%

1Y

24.62%

5Y*

19.27%

10Y*

5.65%

XLF

YTD

-0.28%

1M

-2.42%

6M

3.80%

1Y

19.47%

5Y*

18.42%

10Y*

13.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FHN vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FHN is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FHN is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FHN is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FHN is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FHN is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FHN is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FHN vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Horizon Corporation (FHN) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FHN, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
FHN: 0.64
XLF: 0.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for FHN, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
FHN: 1.15
XLF: 1.37
The chart of Omega ratio for FHN, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FHN: 1.16
XLF: 1.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for FHN, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
FHN: 0.60
XLF: 1.20
The chart of Martin ratio for FHN, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
FHN: 2.60
XLF: 4.72

The current FHN Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHN and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.64
0.92
FHN
XLF

Dividends

FHN vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

FHN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than XLF's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
3.37%2.98%4.24%2.45%3.67%4.70%3.38%3.65%1.80%1.40%1.65%1.47%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.48%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

FHN vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHN drawdown since its inception was -87.57%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHN and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-23.51%
-7.66%
FHN
XLF

Volatility

FHN vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

First Horizon Corporation (FHN) has a higher volatility of 20.01% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 13.51%. This indicates that FHN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.01%
13.51%
FHN
XLF