PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHN vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FHN vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Horizon Corporation (FHN) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHN achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 15.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FHN has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 10.28%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.


FHN

1D
0.56%
1M
3.68%
YTD
5.92%
6M
3.16%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
36.06%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
10.28%

PLD

1D
0.99%
1M
0.28%
YTD
15.53%
6M
15.43%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHN vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
5.92%22.12%47.68%-39.44%53.94%32.61%-18.45%30.48%-32.35%1.93%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
15.53%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FHN and PLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997

0.34

The correlation between FHN and PLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (10 years) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FHN:

$12.15B

PLD:

$139.09B

EPS

FHN:

$2.05

PLD:

$3.88

PE Ratio

FHN:

12.19

PLD:

37.40

PS Ratio

FHN:

2.72

PLD:

15.54

PB Ratio

FHN:

1.44

PLD:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

FHN:

$4.60B

PLD:

$8.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FHN:

$3.40B

PLD:

$3.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

FHN:

$1.40B

PLD:

$7.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHN vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHN
FHN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHN Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHN vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Horizon Corporation (FHN) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHNPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

4.19

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

13.76

-9.75

FHN vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHN Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHN and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHN vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHN drawdown since its inception was -87.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHN and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHNPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.74%

-84.70%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.52%

-9.59%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-31.37%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.76%

-43.30%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.25%

-43.30%

-20.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-4.36%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.06%

-17.35%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

2.91%

+3.78%

Volatility

FHN vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is 5.61%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that FHN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHNPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

7.52%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

15.07%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.55%

21.87%

+3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.01%

26.99%

+10.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.93%

27.02%

+11.91%

Dividends

FHN vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

FHN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PLD's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHN
First Horizon Corporation
2.57%2.51%2.98%4.24%2.45%3.67%4.70%3.38%3.65%1.80%1.40%1.65%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.86%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Financials

FHN vs. PLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Horizon Corporation and Prologis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
862.00M
2.30B
(FHN) Total Revenue
(PLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FHN vs. PLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First Horizon Corporation and Prologis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
10.1%
Portfolio components
FHN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a gross profit of 862.00M and revenue of 862.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

FHN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported an operating income of 357.00M and revenue of 862.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.

PLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

FHN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Horizon Corporation reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 862.00M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.

PLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FHN and PLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to FHN (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHN dropped -87.74% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHN and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer