PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBALX vs. COSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBALX vs. COSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBALX achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than COSSX's 7.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CBALX having a 10.10% annualized return and COSSX not far ahead at 10.31%.


CBALX

1D
0.05%
1M
4.12%
YTD
6.82%
6M
7.03%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
10.10%

COSSX

1D
0.53%
1M
0.93%
YTD
7.45%
6M
10.17%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBALX vs. COSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
6.82%14.14%14.60%21.49%-16.63%14.92%17.91%23.05%-5.75%14.29%
COSSX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class
7.45%45.91%4.82%16.13%-5.96%10.94%0.02%22.51%-16.69%27.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CBALX and COSSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.70

The correlation between CBALX and COSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBALX vs. COSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBALX
CBALX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

COSSX
COSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
COSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBALX vs. COSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBALXCOSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.31

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

8.14

+4.57

CBALX vs. COSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the COSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBALX and COSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBALXCOSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.99

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.59

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.57

+0.14

Drawdowns

CBALX vs. COSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBALX drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, smaller than the maximum COSSX drawdown of -43.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBALX and COSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBALXCOSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.53%

-43.24%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-11.78%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.06%

-13.34%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.91%

-25.76%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.73%

-43.24%

+20.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.54%

+4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-7.13%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

3.34%

-1.80%

Volatility

CBALX vs. COSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) is 2.39%, while Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that CBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBALXCOSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

3.63%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

10.92%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

13.72%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

15.80%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

17.42%

-6.08%

CBALX vs. COSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBALX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than COSSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBALX vs. COSSX - Dividend Comparison

CBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than COSSX's 7.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBALX
Columbia Balanced Fund
6.08%6.42%7.83%1.84%5.36%9.26%5.31%4.16%5.82%2.79%1.60%4.05%
COSSX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class
7.48%8.03%5.51%4.07%1.96%3.70%1.78%3.95%3.72%1.72%2.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBALX and COSSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COSSX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to CBALX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBALX dropped -34.53% vs COSSX's -43.24%.

CBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBALX and COSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer