COSSX vs. SHGTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

COSSX (Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class) and SHGTX (Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - COSSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while SHGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, COSSX returned 10.86%/yr vs 26.00%/yr for SHGTX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. COSSX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SHGTX.

Performance

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSSX achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 44.24% return. Over the past 10 years, COSSX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 10.86%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.00% annualized return.

COSSX

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: 4.22%
• 6M: 3.35%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 10.86%
• ALL TIME*: 10.03%

SHGTX

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: -3.79%
• 6M: 32.24%
• YTD: 44.24%
• 1Y: 80.86%
• 3Y*: 37.72%
• 5Y*: 22.58%
• 10Y*: 26.00%
• ALL TIME*: 15.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COSSX Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COSSX Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class	10.32%	45.91%	4.82%	16.13%	-5.96%	10.94%	0.02%	22.51%	-16.69%	27.83%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	44.24%	35.09%	26.04%	45.28%	-31.70%	38.60%	45.56%	54.92%	-8.70%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between COSSX and SHGTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.60

The correlation between COSSX and SHGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COSSX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COSSX

COSSX Risk / Return Rank: 71
COSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
COSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
COSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
COSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
COSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SHGTX

SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 92
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COSSX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.60	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.06	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.40	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	5.87	-3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	19.26	-12.56

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSSX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.24%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSSX and SHGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COSSX	SHGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.24%	-77.47%	+34.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.78%	-13.15%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.34%	-28.90%	+15.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-43.17%	+17.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.24%	-43.17%	-0.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-8.92%	+6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.10%	-24.84%	+17.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	3.98%	+0.05%

Volatility

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) is 4.38%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that COSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COSSX	SHGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	10.23%	-5.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.80%	23.55%	-11.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.20%	29.70%	-15.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	28.14%	-12.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	27.05%	-10.05%

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

COSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, more than SHGTX's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COSSX Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class	12.41%	8.03%	5.51%	4.07%	1.96%	3.70%	1.78%	3.95%	3.72%	1.72%	2.18%	0.00%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	5.86%	8.45%	14.04%	6.22%	3.94%	11.77%	9.92%	10.26%	12.75%	7.25%	8.13%	8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COSSX and SHGTX in my portfolio?

COSSX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COSSX or SHGTX?

SHGTX has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to COSSX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSSX dropped -43.24% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.