PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSSX vs. SHGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSSX achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 58.24% return. Over the past 10 years, COSSX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.99% annualized return.


COSSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
6.17%
6M
6.09%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
10.36%

SHGTX

1D
3.81%
1M
8.06%
YTD
58.24%
6M
56.21%
1Y
116.33%
3Y*
44.50%
5Y*
25.92%
10Y*
27.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COSSX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class
6.17%45.91%4.82%16.13%-5.96%10.94%0.02%22.51%-16.69%27.83%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
58.24%35.09%26.04%45.28%-31.70%38.60%45.56%54.92%-8.70%34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between COSSX and SHGTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.60

The correlation between COSSX and SHGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSSX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSSX
COSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
COSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SHGTX
SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSSXSHGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.60

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

9.28

-7.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

33.22

-25.91

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSSX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSSX drawdown since its inception was -43.24%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSSX and SHGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSSXSHGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.24%

-77.47%

+34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-12.45%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-28.90%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-43.17%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

-43.17%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-0.08%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-24.90%

+17.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.47%

+0.11%

Volatility

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class (COSSX) is 4.16%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 11.69%. This indicates that COSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSSXSHGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

11.69%

-7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

21.95%

-10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

27.74%

-13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

27.77%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

26.96%

-9.57%

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSSX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

COSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than SHGTX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSSX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund Institutional 2 Class
7.57%8.03%5.51%4.07%1.96%3.70%1.78%3.95%3.72%1.72%2.18%0.00%
SHGTX
Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund
5.34%8.45%14.04%6.22%3.94%11.77%9.92%10.26%12.75%7.25%8.13%8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSSX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHGTX has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to COSSX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSSX dropped -43.24% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSSX and SHGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer