CATH vs. SPMO
CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.82%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for SPMO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
CATH vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 14.82%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
CATH
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
SPMO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
CATH vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 6.52% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and SPMO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CATH and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
CATH vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CATH
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CATH
SPMO
Financial Services
CATH
SPMO
Communication Services
CATH
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
CATH
SPMO
Industrials
CATH
SPMO
Healthcare
CATH
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
CATH
SPMO
Energy
CATH
SPMO
Utilities
CATH
SPMO
Real Estate
CATH
SPMO
Basic Materials
CATH
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
SPMO
CATH vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.45 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | 12.97 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATH vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -30.95% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -12.70% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -20.13% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -22.74% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -30.95% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -4.53% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -4.59% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 3.37% | -1.20% |
Volatility
CATH vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 4.71%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 11.75% | -7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 17.78% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 20.55% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 19.88% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 20.60% | -1.96% |
CATH vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATH vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.79% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CATH and SPMO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to CATH (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs 14.82% for CATH. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.
CATH has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
CATH is categorized as S&P 500, while SPMO is Momentum. CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATH and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer