CATF vs. QINT
CATF (American Century California Municipal Bond ETF) and QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CATF is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while QINT is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. CATF is actively managed, while QINT is passively managed. Over the past year, CATF returned 4.71% vs 26.49% for QINT. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CATF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for QINT.
Performance
CATF vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 11.64% return.
CATF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.26%
QINT
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $169.20K | $193.20K | $268.79K | |
| $2.00M | $2.83M | $3.27M |
CATF vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 0.22% | 3.78% | 0.62% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 11.64% | 38.12% | -3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATF and QINT is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.18 |
The correlation between CATF and QINT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATF vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
CATF
QINT
CATF vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATF | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.32 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 9.36 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATF vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and QINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATF | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -33.86% | +29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -11.41% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.04% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -7.42% | +6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 2.82% | -1.95% |
Volatility
CATF vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) is 0.99%, while American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that CATF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATF | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 4.78% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 13.56% | -11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 15.62% | -12.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 16.36% | -12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.25% | 18.04% | -13.79% |
CATF vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATF vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than QINT's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 3.35% | 3.40% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.43% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CATF and QINT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QINT has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to CATF (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs QINT's -33.86%.
On 1-year performance, QINT leads with 26.49% vs 4.71% for CATF. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CATF has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QINT has performed better with a 26.49% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
CATF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.43% for QINT.
CATF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QINT is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.39% for QINT.
QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATF and QINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer