PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATF vs. TAXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATF vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's -0.06% return.


CATF

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.95%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.26%

TAXI

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.30%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$169.20K$193.20K$268.79K
$315.33K$522.95K$833.42K

CATF vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CATF and TAXI is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATF vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CATF
CATF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CATF vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATFTAXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

CATF vs. TAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATF vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and TAXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATFTAXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-2.23%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.78%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-0.53%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

CATF vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATFTAXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

1.95%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

1.95%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

1.95%

+2.30%

CATF vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CATF vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than TAXI's 2.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CATF and TAXI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CATF.

CATF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.25% for TAXI.

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.05% for TAXI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATF and TAXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer