CARU vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. CARU is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -15.14% vs -27.35% for OOQB. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

CARU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -23.03% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -18.43% return.

CARU

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 8.25%
• YTD: -23.03%
• 6M: -25.68%
• 1Y: -15.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-23.03%	-3.04%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and OOQB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.55

The correlation between CARU and OOQB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CARU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARU	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	-0.53	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	-0.50	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.94	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	-0.51	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	-0.91	+0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARU vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARU	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	-0.53	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	-0.41	+0.36

Drawdowns

CARU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-53.44%	-13.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-53.44%	+2.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.22%	-43.69%	+4.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.91%	-23.26%	-12.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.99%	30.11%	-6.12%

Volatility

CARU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 22.70% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.70%	0.00%	+22.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.26%	39.39%	+10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.70%	51.57%	+17.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.27%	58.12%	+22.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.27%	58.12%	+22.15%

CARU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.

Position	TTM	2025
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and OOQB in my portfolio?

CARU and OOQB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or OOQB?

CARU has higher volatility (22.70%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or OOQB?

On 1-year performance, CARU leads with -15.14% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or OOQB?

Over the 1-year period, CARU has performed better with a -15.14% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or OOQB?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

What is the main difference between CARU and OOQB?

CARU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Max and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.75% for OOQB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.