CARK vs. SPYG
CARK (Castleark Large Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by CastleArk, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. CARK is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past year, CARK returned 22.33% vs 33.95% for SPYG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CARK charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
CARK vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.
CARK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
CARK vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF | 8.34% | 10.84% | 26.49% | 3.57% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 3.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARK and SPYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between CARK and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
CARK vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARK
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CARK
SPYG
Communication Services
CARK
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
CARK
SPYG
Financial Services
CARK
SPYG
Healthcare
CARK
SPYG
Industrials
CARK
SPYG
Basic Materials
CARK
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
CARK
-
SPYG
Energy
CARK
-
SPYG
Real Estate
CARK
-
SPYG
Utilities
CARK
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARK vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
CARK
SPYG
CARK vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 2.48 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 10.25 | -5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.12 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.35 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
CARK vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.22% | -67.63% | +42.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -13.76% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.13% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -24.33% | +19.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 3.32% | +1.55% |
Volatility
CARK vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) is 3.92%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that CARK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 4.35% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 12.46% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 16.06% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 21.17% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 20.64% | +0.06% |
CARK vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARK vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CARK and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to CARK (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARK dropped -25.22% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 33.95% vs 22.33% for CARK. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CARK has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 33.95% return vs 22.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CARK.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.01% for CARK.
CARK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: CastleArk and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CARK and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARK and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer