PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARK vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARK vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.


CARK

1D
-1.13%
1M
5.14%
YTD
8.34%
6M
8.76%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-5.29%
1M
25.28%
YTD
79.03%
6M
68.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARK vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CARK
Castleark Large Growth ETF
8.34%-0.94%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
79.03%-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CARK and MEME is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.54

CARK vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CARK
MEME

Technology

55.1%
58.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Financial Services

8.5%
5.7%

Healthcare

6.5%
5.4%

Industrials

5.5%
29.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.7%

Technology

CARK
55.1%
MEME
58.8%

Communication Services

CARK
15.8%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CARK
8.7%
MEME

-

Financial Services

CARK
8.5%
MEME
5.7%

Healthcare

CARK
6.5%
MEME
5.4%

Industrials

CARK
5.5%
MEME
29.9%

Basic Materials

CARK

-

MEME
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

CARK

-

MEME

-

Energy

CARK

-

MEME
4.8%

Real Estate

CARK

-

MEME

-

Utilities

CARK

-

MEME
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARK vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARK
CARK Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARK Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARK vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARKMEMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.59

CARK vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARKMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.28

+0.69

Drawdowns

CARK vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARKMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.22%

-48.78%

+23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-5.93%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-29.90%

+25.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

Volatility

CARK vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARKMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.06%

74.19%

-57.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

74.19%

-53.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

74.19%

-53.49%

CARK vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARK vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CARK
Castleark Large Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARK and MEME have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CARK is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CARK is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

CARK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: CastleArk and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CARK and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARK and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer