PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARD vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARD vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARD vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
27.01%-60.21%-58.19%-44.50%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
4.46%-74.63%-93.80%-30.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's 4.46% return.


CARD

1D
-10.04%
1M
20.30%
YTD
27.01%
6M
23.34%
1Y
-54.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDQ

1D
-11.16%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
4.46%
6M
-4.52%
1Y
-76.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARD vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CARD vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARD vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARDNVDQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

-0.93

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.70

-1.69

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.79

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.90

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-1.02

+0.17

CARD vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARD and NVDQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARDNVDQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-0.93

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

-0.87

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CARD and NVDQ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CARD vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.


TTM202520242023
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.25%0.26%4.59%11.60%

Drawdowns

CARD vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and NVDQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARDNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.51%

-99.13%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.41%

-85.00%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.46%

-98.94%

+8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.62%

-87.41%

+20.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.55%

74.44%

-8.89%

Volatility

CARD vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 25.18% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 20.96%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARDNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.18%

20.96%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.70%

51.99%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.47%

82.28%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.97%

96.83%

-15.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.97%

96.83%

-15.86%