CAPE vs. RSP
CAPE (iPath Shiller CAPE ETN) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAPE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 15.23%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAPE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
CAPE vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.
CAPE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
CAPE vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | -1.70% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPE and RSP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CAPE and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
CAPE vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAPE
RSP
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
CAPE
RSP
Communication Services
CAPE
RSP
Healthcare
CAPE
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
CAPE
RSP
Real Estate
CAPE
RSP
Financial Services
CAPE
RSP
Basic Materials
CAPE
RSP
Technology
CAPE
RSP
Industrials
CAPE
RSP
Energy
CAPE
-
RSP
Utilities
CAPE
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAPE vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
CAPE
RSP
CAPE vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAPE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.30 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 2.49 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 9.48 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAPE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.70 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.57 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
CAPE vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAPE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -59.92% | +37.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -7.85% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -17.81% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -0.38% | -4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -6.65% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.06% | +0.59% |
Volatility
CAPE vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAPE | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.56% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.29% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 11.56% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.18% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 18.35% | -1.42% |
CAPE vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAPE vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | 1.41% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAPE and RSP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 3-year performance, RSP leads with 15.23% vs 12.19% for CAPE. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSP has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CAPE.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.41% for CAPE.
CAPE is categorized as Global Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. CAPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAPE and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer