PortfoliosLab logo
CAPE vs. YACKX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and YACKX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CAPE vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAPE:

1.01

YACKX:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

CAPE:

1.48

YACKX:

0.41

Omega Ratio

CAPE:

1.20

YACKX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

CAPE:

1.09

YACKX:

0.22

Martin Ratio

CAPE:

4.14

YACKX:

0.81

Ulcer Index

CAPE:

3.78%

YACKX:

3.59%

Daily Std Dev

CAPE:

16.09%

YACKX:

13.18%

Max Drawdown

CAPE:

-22.07%

YACKX:

-46.65%

Current Drawdown

CAPE:

-2.65%

YACKX:

-1.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 4.07% return.


CAPE

YTD

3.64%

1M

2.98%

6M

-2.65%

1Y

16.06%

3Y*

11.66%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

YACKX

YTD

4.07%

1M

3.93%

6M

-1.62%

1Y

4.18%

3Y*

6.94%

5Y*

12.62%

10Y*

9.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iPath Shiller CAPE ETN

AMG Yacktman Fund

CAPE vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAPE vs. YACKX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAPE is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAPE is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAPE is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAPE is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAPE is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAPE is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

YACKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YACKX is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YACKX is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YACKX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YACKX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YACKX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YACKX is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAPE vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the YACKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and YACKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CAPE vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than YACKX's 9.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.22%1.23%1.01%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
9.32%9.70%4.39%7.35%3.71%10.81%9.32%23.06%10.67%8.56%13.66%4.39%

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and YACKX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CAPE vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison

iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 2.82%. This indicates that CAPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...