PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPE vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return.


CAPE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.57%
6M
0.07%
YTD
2.29%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.75%

TQQQ

1D
2.09%
1M
-11.90%
6M
20.14%
YTD
23.06%
1Y
56.87%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
39.46%
ALL TIME*
42.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$508.60K$475.70K$946.02K
$4.37B$4.57B$5.33B

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAPE
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF
2.29%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
23.06%34.35%58.27%198.04%-69.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and TQQQ is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between CAPE and TQQQ has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAPE
TQQQ

Communication Services

25.2%
15.8%

Real Estate

24.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

24.6%
7.7%

Financial Services

24.6%
0.2%

Healthcare

23.6%
4.2%

Technology

0.4%
53.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
12.3%

Industrials

0.1%
2.8%

Energy

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Communication Services

CAPE
25.2%
TQQQ
15.8%

Real Estate

CAPE
24.8%
TQQQ
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

CAPE
24.6%
TQQQ
7.7%

Financial Services

CAPE
24.6%
TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

CAPE
23.6%
TQQQ
4.2%

Technology

CAPE
0.4%
TQQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

CAPE
0.3%
TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CAPE
0.2%
TQQQ
12.3%

Industrials

CAPE
0.1%
TQQQ
2.8%

Energy

CAPE

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Utilities

CAPE

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPE vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAPE
CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAPETQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.17

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.29

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

3.60

-1.53

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPETQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-81.66%

+59.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-36.97%

+27.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-58.04%

+43.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-25.74%

+24.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-18.49%

+13.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

13.24%

-10.50%

Volatility

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) is 4.59%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPETQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

20.41%

-15.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

47.79%

-38.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

57.62%

-46.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

68.04%

-51.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

66.57%

-49.72%

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPE vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAPE
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF
1.37%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.58%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPE and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to CAPE (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.81% vs 10.41% for CAPE. On fees, CAPE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CAPE has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.81% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAPE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

CAPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.

CAPE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAPE and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPE and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer