CAPE vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
CAPE and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAPE is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2012. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both CAPE and TQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAPE or TQQQ.
Key characteristics
| CAPE | TQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.62% | 12.24% |
| 1Y Return | 23.46% | 116.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.78 | 2.34 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.59% | 48.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.07% | -81.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.72% | -34.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPE and TQQQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 12.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than TQQQ's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | 1.05% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 1.24% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAPE vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) is 3.71%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 17.43%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.