CANE vs. XBNB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and XBNB (Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while XBNB is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Binance Coin (BNB). Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for XBNB.

Performance

CANE vs. XBNB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CANE

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 0.53%
• YTD: -2.31%
• 1Y: -13.75%
• 3Y*: -10.13%
• 5Y*: 2.40%
• 10Y*: -2.85%

XBNB

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -12.87%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANE vs. XBNB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	1.49%
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	-22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CANE and XBNB is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.12

Return for Risk

CANE vs. XBNB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANE

CANE Risk / Return Rank: 4
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

XBNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANE vs. XBNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CANE	XBNB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	—	—

Drawdowns

CANE vs. XBNB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than XBNB's maximum drawdown of -40.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and XBNB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CANE	XBNB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.30%	-40.97%	-40.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.78%	-35.63%	-28.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.54%	-19.92%	-36.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CANE	XBNB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	85.86%	-65.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.01%	85.86%	-64.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	85.86%	-64.26%

CANE vs. XBNB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than XBNB's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CANE vs. XBNB - Dividend Comparison

CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.00%
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CANE and XBNB in my portfolio?

CANE and XBNB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CANE or XBNB?

On fees, CANE is cheaper at 1.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CANE or XBNB?

CANE is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CANE or XBNB?

XBNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.

What is the main difference between CANE and XBNB?

CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while XBNB is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. CANE tracks Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while XBNB tracks Binance Coin (BNB). Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 1.89% for XBNB.