PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CANE vs. NYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CANE vs. NYF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and NYF (iShares New York Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while NYF is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CANE returned -2.23%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for NYF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NYF.

Performance

CANE vs. NYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than NYF's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CANE has underperformed NYF with an annualized return of -2.23%, while NYF has yielded a comparatively higher 1.81% annualized return.

CANE

1D
-1.02%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
0.83%
1Y
-14.28%
3Y*
-10.43%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
-2.23%

NYF

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.91%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANE vs. NYF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund		-0.77%-14.65%-7.79%30.06%3.59%36.30%-3.85%-0.97%-27.52%-24.76%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF		1.51%3.64%1.13%5.76%-7.75%1.34%4.18%6.49%0.66%5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CANE and NYF is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2011

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CANE and NYF has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Teucrium Sugar Fund

iShares New York Muni Bond ETF

Often compared with CANE:
CANE vs. WEATCANE vs. CAMTCANE vs. FDEGXCANE vs. CCJCANE vs. SOYBCANE vs. DBACANE vs. LLY
Often compared with NYF:
NYF vs. VNYUXNYF vs. MUBNYF vs. VNYTXNYF vs. PZTNYF vs. FTFMXNYF vs. FMNYNYF vs. AGZ

Return for Risk

CANE vs. NYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CANE
CANE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
NYF
NYF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANE vs. NYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CANENYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.69
2.46

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.90
3.51

-4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.53

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.48

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

8.88

-10.06

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CANE vs. NYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANE Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the NYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANE and NYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CANENYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

2.46

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.21

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

0.40

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.47

-0.73

Drawdowns

CANE vs. NYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than NYF's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and NYF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CANENYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-13.12%

-68.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.89%

-2.76%

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.73%

-5.68%

-36.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.73%

-12.71%

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.29%

-13.12%

-54.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.21%

-0.56%

-62.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.50%

-2.31%

-54.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

0.77%

+11.58%

Volatility

CANE vs. NYF - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) at 0.95%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CANENYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

0.95%

+5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

2.08%

+13.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

2.78%

+17.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

4.00%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

4.48%

+17.24%

CANE vs. NYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than NYF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CANE vs. NYF - Dividend Comparison

CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF		3.09%2.99%2.77%2.36%2.04%1.85%1.98%2.19%2.48%2.46%2.43%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

CANE and NYF have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CANE has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to NYF (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs NYF's -13.12%.

On 10-year performance, NYF leads with 1.81% vs -2.23% for CANE. On fees, NYF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NYF has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NYF has performed better with a 1.81% return vs -2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NYF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for CANE.

NYF has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.

CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while NYF is Municipal Bonds. CANE tracks Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while NYF tracks S&P New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 0.25% for NYF.

NYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CANE and NYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer