PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYF vs. FMNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NYF vs. FMNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) and First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYF achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than FMNY's 0.61% return.


NYF

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.80%
6M
-0.30%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
1.60%
ALL TIME*
3.05%

FMNY

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.01%
6M
-0.02%
YTD
0.61%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$155.96K$199.54K$177.53K
$8.19M$7.30M$7.67M

NYF vs. FMNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
0.39%3.64%1.13%5.76%-7.75%0.89%
FMNY
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF
0.61%3.94%1.74%6.14%-10.65%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NYF and FMNY is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.68

The correlation between NYF and FMNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYF vs. FMNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NYF
NYF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FMNY
FMNY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NYF vs. FMNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) and First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NYFFMNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.10

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.02

6.40

-0.38

NYF vs. FMNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FMNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYF and FMNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NYF vs. FMNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYF drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum FMNY drawdown of -15.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYF and FMNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYFFMNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-15.90%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.83%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.62%

-5.26%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.60%

-15.74%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.01%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-5.53%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.93%

-0.10%

Volatility

NYF vs. FMNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) is 0.83%, while First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF (FMNY) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that NYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYFFMNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.95%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

2.41%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

3.37%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.01%

4.01%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

3.95%

+0.53%

NYF vs. FMNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYF has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FMNY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NYF vs. FMNY - Dividend Comparison

NYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than FMNY's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMNY
First Trust New York High Income Municipal ETF
3.78%3.64%3.56%3.25%2.34%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NYF
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
2.90%2.99%2.77%2.36%2.04%1.85%1.98%2.19%2.48%2.46%2.43%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NYF and FMNY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMNY has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to NYF (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYF dropped -13.12% vs FMNY's -15.90%.

On 5-year performance, NYF leads with 0.47% vs 0.13% for FMNY. On fees, NYF is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NYF has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NYF has performed better with a 0.47% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NYF is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMNY.

FMNY has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 2.90% for NYF.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYF and 0.65% for FMNY.

NYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYF and FMNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer