CANE vs. CXRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. CANE is passively managed, while CXRN is actively managed. Over the past year, CANE returned -14.28% vs -23.31% for CXRN. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.

Performance

CANE vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.

CANE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -0.77%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: -14.28%
• 3Y*: -10.43%
• 5Y*: 2.90%
• 10Y*: -2.23%

CXRN

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -21.78%
• YTD: -13.42%
• 6M: -14.31%
• 1Y: -23.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANE vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	-0.77%	-14.65%	-6.08%
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-13.42%	-25.68%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CANE and CXRN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.11

Return for Risk

CANE vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANE

CANE Risk / Return Rank: 3
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 3
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANE vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CANE	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	-0.64	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	-0.73	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.91	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	-0.93	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	-1.67	+0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CANE vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANE Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANE and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CANE	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	-0.64	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	-0.61	+0.35

Drawdowns

CANE vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than CXRN's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and CXRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CANE	CXRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.30%	-46.71%	-34.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.89%	-25.27%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.21%	-46.16%	-17.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.50%	-30.08%	-26.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.35%	13.97%	-1.62%

Volatility

CANE vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) is 6.85%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that CANE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CANE	CXRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	15.39%	-8.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	26.75%	-10.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.69%	36.32%	-15.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.07%	36.90%	-15.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.72%	36.90%	-15.18%

CANE vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CANE vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.61%	3.30%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CANE and CXRN in my portfolio?

CANE and CXRN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CANE or CXRN?

CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to CANE (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs CXRN's -46.71%.

Which ETF is better, CANE or CXRN?

On 1-year performance, CANE leads with -14.28% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CANE has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CANE or CXRN?

Over the 1-year period, CANE has performed better with a -14.28% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CANE or CXRN?

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for CANE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CANE or CXRN?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.

What is the main difference between CANE and CXRN?

CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 0.95% for CXRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CXRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.