CANC vs. XHS
Compare and contrast key facts about Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS).
CANC and XHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CANC is an actively managed fund by Tema. It was launched on Aug 14, 2023. XHS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011.
Performance
CANC vs. XHS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CANC vs. XHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 5.69% | 42.92% | -5.37% | 510.51% | -85.34% | -51.82% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | -6.26% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANC achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than XHS's -6.26% return.
CANC
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 27.93%
- 1Y
- 52.46%
- 3Y*
- 140.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHS
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CANC vs. XHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XHS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CANC vs. XHS — Risk / Return Rank
CANC
XHS
CANC vs. XHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANC | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.12 | +1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 0.30 | +2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 0.25 | +3.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 0.68 | +13.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANC | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.12 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.52 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between CANC and XHS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CANC vs. XHS - Dividend Comparison
CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than XHS's 0.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 3.00% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.29% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Drawdowns
CANC vs. XHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANC drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than XHS's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANC and XHS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANC | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -39.32% | -58.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -12.61% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.19% | -12.33% | -43.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.91% | -10.27% | -63.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 4.53% | -0.92% |
Volatility
CANC vs. XHS - Volatility Comparison
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) at 4.98%. This indicates that CANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CANC | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 4.98% | +3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 12.45% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.24% | 19.25% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 285.66% | 21.05% | +264.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 285.66% | 22.41% | +263.25% |