PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAML.L vs. ATYM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAML.L achieves a -20.96% return, which is significantly lower than ATYM.L's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CAML.L has underperformed ATYM.L with an annualized return of 6.34%, while ATYM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.18% annualized return.


CAML.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
-20.96%
6M
-10.91%
1Y
-6.24%
3Y*
-1.46%
5Y*
-4.67%
10Y*
6.34%

ATYM.L

1D
-2.17%
1M
15.09%
YTD
0.35%
6M
15.79%
1Y
96.23%
3Y*
41.16%
5Y*
23.68%
10Y*
24.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAML.L
Central Asia Metals plc
-20.96%30.42%-4.92%-19.97%4.93%15.02%12.57%8.10%-24.46%44.65%
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.35%141.03%0.93%11.73%-17.55%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CAML.L and ATYM.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2010

0.19

Over the past year, CAML.L and ATYM.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAML.L:

£266.43M

ATYM.L:

£1.34B

EPS

CAML.L:

-£0.14

ATYM.L:

£0.56

PS Ratio

CAML.L:

0.62

ATYM.L:

2.71

PB Ratio

CAML.L:

0.94

ATYM.L:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAML.L:

£444.93M

ATYM.L:

£473.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAML.L:

£207.40M

ATYM.L:

£148.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

CAML.L:

£205.70M

ATYM.L:

£170.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAML.L
CAML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CAML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CAML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) and Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAML.LATYM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

2.62

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

7.10

-7.50

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAML.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAML.L and ATYM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAML.LATYM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.20

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.60

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.61

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.13

+0.12

Drawdowns

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAML.L drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, smaller than the maximum ATYM.L drawdown of -93.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAML.L and ATYM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAML.LATYM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-93.04%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.62%

-36.50%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.62%

-36.87%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.66%

-57.48%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.86%

-68.65%

+6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.47%

-20.11%

-18.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-61.85%

+43.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.61%

13.50%

+5.11%

Volatility

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Central Asia Metals plc (CAML.L) is 8.52%, while Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a volatility of 15.11%. This indicates that CAML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATYM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAML.LATYM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

15.11%

-6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.96%

36.24%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.98%

43.49%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.82%

39.78%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.44%

39.30%

-2.86%

Dividends

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Dividend Comparison

CAML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than ATYM.L's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.71%0.71%1.72%1.91%2.12%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CAML.L
Central Asia Metals plc
8.08%7.18%11.46%10.51%8.87%6.18%2.50%6.59%7.59%5.39%5.94%7.82%

Financials

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Asia Metals plc and Atalaya Mining Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


70.00M80.00M90.00M100.00M110.00M120.00M130.00M202120222023202420252026
131.03M
120.87M
(CAML.L) Total Revenue
(ATYM.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

CAML.L vs. ATYM.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Central Asia Metals plc and Atalaya Mining Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
49.0%
35.9%
Portfolio components
CAML.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported a gross profit of 64.15M and revenue of 131.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

ATYM.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 43.43M and revenue of 120.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

CAML.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported an operating income of 46.18M and revenue of 131.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.2%.

ATYM.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 37.65M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.

CAML.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Asia Metals plc reported a net income of -84.40M and revenue of 131.03M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.

ATYM.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.39M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAML.L and ATYM.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAML.L and ATYM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer